Shadow SPI Reports


Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Amendment (Transparency and Fit and Proper Persons) Bill 2024

Rice Marketing Amendment Bill 2024

National Parks and Heritage Legislation Amendment Bill 2024

Ombudsman and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024

Emergency Services Levy Insurance Monitor Bill 2024

Health Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous) Bill 2024

Jury Amendment Bill

Emergency Services Levy Amendment Bill 2024

Example Shadow SPI – Crimes Legislation Amendment (Assaults on retail workers) Bill 2023
The Shadow SPI Assessment Criteria.
INADEQUATE
NEED: The SPI does not describe the problem/issue, lacks relevant context, evidence, and does not explain the necessity of action.
OBJECTIVES: The SPI does not clearly articulate how the Bill serves the public interest.
OPTIONS: The SPI fails to outline any alternative policy options or mechanisms considered. No justification provided for the legislative choice.
ANALYSIS: The SPI lacks analysis of any policy options, their benefits and costs, and does not compare different policy options.
PATHWAY: The SPI lacks information on proposed implementation pathways, milestones, timelines, or plan for review/evaluation.
CONSULTATION: The SPI does not detail any of the consultation processes and stakeholders involved and provides no evidence of stakeholder engagement.
ADEQUATE
NEED: The SPI partially describes the problem/issue but lacks evidence or context.
OBJECTIVES: The SPI vaguely describes how the Bill serves the public interest.
OPTIONS: The SPI outlines some policy options but lacks detail or justification. Limited explanation for legislative choice.
ANALYSIS: The SPI provides limited analysis of policy options and their impacts, with minimal comparison between options.
PATHWAY: The SPI outlines a basic implementation pathway with limited detail on milestones, timelines, or review/evaluation plans.
CONSULTATION: The SPI partially details the consultation processes and stakeholders involved, and provides limited evidence of stakeholder engagement.
GOOD PRACTICE
NEED: The SPI describes the problem/issue and affected parties, provides relevant context, evidence, and explains the necessity of action.
OBJECTIVES: The SPI clearly describes how the Bill serves the public interest with general examples and identifies constraints (if applicable).
OPTIONS: The SPI provides an outline of policy options considered, with some justification. Offers a brief explanation for legislative choice.
ANALYSIS: The SPI presents analysis of policy options, their benefits and costs, and provides some comparison between options.
PATHWAY: The SPI provides a clear implementation pathway with milestones, timelines, and a plan for review/evaluation..
CONSULTATION: The SPI outlines the consultation processes and stakeholders involved and provides evidence of stakeholder engagement.
EXEMPLARY
NEED: The SPI thoroughly describes the problem/issue and affected parties, provides comprehensive evidence and context, and convincingly explains the necessity of action.
OBJECTIVES: The SPI thoroughly describes how the Bill serves the public interest with specific examples and identifies constraints (if applicable).
OPTIONS: The SPI provides a comprehensive outline of policy options considered with thorough justification. It clearly explains legislative choice with detailed reasoning.
ANALYSIS: The SPI presents thorough analysis of policy options, their benefits and costs, and effectively compares options with depth and insight.
PATHWAY: The SPI presents a detailed implementation pathway with clear milestones, timelines, and a robust plan for review/evaluation.
CONSULTATION: The SPI thoroughly details consultation processes including information about stakeholders involved, and provides detailed evidence of stakeholder engagement.